“More group study rooms and a coffee machine, please!” International students’ wishes and library user experiences | ”Lisää ryhmätyöhuoneita ja kahvinkeitin, kiitos!” Kansainvälisten opiskelijoiden toiveet ja kirjaston käyttökokemukset

(Lopussa suomenkielinen tiivistelmä)

We at the library often consider whether we can serve all our customers in the best possible way. What kind of things do our international students value, for example? Since things are usually worked out best by asking, we decided to do so. In early spring in the library worked an UEF trainee, Gonzalo, who conducted a user survey for our international students. What kind of ideas and suggestions for development emerged from the survey?

57 students from different countries responded to the survey. The majority of respondents (37) studied in Joensuu, 20 in Kuopio. Many of the respondents have probably returned to their home countries already, but still: thank you very much for participating, every answer and comment is valuable!

Word cloud of the respondents' home countries: for example Italy, Germany, France, Iran, Spain, Pakistan, Turkey, Ireland, Kenya etc.
The students who responded to the survey were from all over the world.

We wanted to know, among other things, what students think about the library facilities, what they do in the library, where they find information about library services and have they encountered challenges or problems in using the library? Three points arose in particular from the responses to the survey:

  1. Students hope for more group study rooms
  2. Finding books on shelves is challenging
  3. Library facilities are functional and comfortable.

“More group study rooms. There are not a lot”

What do international students do and want to do in the library? Work at the computer, study together and borrow books – in the top of the three.

Answers to the question "What do you do in the library": work on the computer, group study work, borrow books, read books, relax, meet friends, other.
Answers to the question “What do you do in the library”.

Studying together and meeting friends at the library also came up in many responses. A wish for spaces where one could speak more freely often repeated: “More collaborative meeting areas where talking is allowed”, “A room to study but being able to talk without bothering others” and “More group work and to have more meeting areas to discuss”. This wish has certainly been identified throughout the university: students yearn for places where one can encounter other students and study together. At the same time, silence and working peace also emerged in the comments: “Have more group study places, and have people respect the silence more. Maybe marking out areas where people are allowed to talk would be a good way.” We at the library start working on a plan for better signposts and clearer spatial communication to ensure working peace for everyone. Adding new group study rooms, unfortunately, is currently almost impossible.

“Finding a book is challenging”

The biggest challenges in using the library involved finding books on the shelf – especially in Joensuu campus library. UEF Primo’s instructions were perceived as difficult and the placement of books on the shelf even illogical: “I would change the way books are classed on the shelves. Sometimes it’s the author’s name, sometimes the first letters of the book’s title, sometimes it’s by topic, sometimes it’s upstairs, sometimes it’s downstairs. Also the software that indicates where the books are is not always accurate. It is annoying to have to look for a long time to find the book I’m looking for.” We are trying to fix this problem as much as possible. Clearer shelf signage and possible changes to the database are already in the design.

“I love your study areas and couldn’t have managed through my first year in the university without the calmness of the library”

What beautiful feedback the library received from its premises! There were many answers to the question “what is your favorite place in the library”. The top three were comfortable chairs (especially those near the windows), group study rooms and all the places where you can relax. Someone even stated the following: “Most of the times I study in the library because it is more comfortable than my student home.” Of course, there is something to be developed: in addition to insufficient group study rooms, a coffee or a snack machine was wanted in the library: “It would be great if we had a place where we can get some coffee / water / snacks after the café is closed”. This is something we promise to ask the university about, because it would certainly serve the users of the library’s 24/7 facilities.

Nojatuoleja ja jalkalamppuja ikkunan luona Joensuun kampuskirjastossa. Comfy chairs and floor lamps close to the windows in Joensuu campus library.

Some other issues that were questioned: only 35% was aware, that there are information skills courses offered by the library available and only 20% had attended them. Those people thought that the course was very useful. We must step up the awareness about these courses, so that more people could gain them in the future. When asked about the channels where people get information about the library and its services, the library’s home page and UEF Primo seemed to be the most popular combination. Still, 20% had never used the library’s homepage. We are going to edit the homepages of both the library and UEF Primo to clarify their purpose – the library’s homepage tells comprehensively about the services, while UEF Primo is one, although the most important, of those services.

We at the Library warmly thank everyone who responded to the survey, and encourage you all to give feedback and wishes in the future. Without you students, the library is just an empty space!

Lyhyesti suomeksi

Kirjasto toteutti kevättalvella 2022 kyselyn palveluistaan kansainvälisille opiskelijoille. Kyselyyn saatiin 57 vastausta eri maiden kansalaisilta. Kyselyn avulla kartoitettiin mm. kirjaston tilojen käyttöä, toiveita, mahdollisia haasteita ja kirjaston palveluiden löytyvyyttä. Kyselyn avulla selvisi kolme pääkohtaa:

  1. Kansainväliset opiskelijat kaipaavat lisää ryhmätyötiloja.
  2. Kirjojen löytäminen hyllyistä tuntuu haastavalta (etenkin Joensuun kampuskirjastossa).
  3. Kirjaston tilat ovat toimivat ja viihtyisät.

Hyvien kehitysehdotusten ja kommenttien avulla kirjasto jatkaa palveluidensa kehittämistä. Ryhmätyötilojen lisääminen ei valitettavasti näillä näkymin onnistu, mutta toivottavasti saamme kehitettyä kirjastotilojen käyttöä ja kirjojen löytyvyyttä esimerkiksi erilaisin opastein. Kehitämme myös edelleen esimerkiksi UEF-Primon etusivua sekä kirjaston kotisivuja, jotta tieto erilaisista palveluista olisi helpommin löydettävissä.

Kirjasto ottaa mielellään vastaan palautetta ja kehitysehdotuksia kaikilta käyttäjiltään jatkossakin – ilman teitä opiskelijoita kirjasto olisi vain tyhjä tila!

Riitta Holopainen, information specialist | tietoasiantuntija
Laura Parikka, information specialist | tietoasiantuntija
Training and information services | Opetus- ja tietopalvelut

 

Share

Koulutusta metriikasta kaivataan | Training for metrics needed

(Please, scroll down to read the results of the English version of the survey.)

Kiitokset kaikille lokakuussa 2018 Tutkimus- ja julkaisutoiminnan mittarit -kyselyyn osallistuneille. Suomenkieliseen kyselyyn vastasi 123 henkilöä perusopiskelijoista emeritus/emeritaprofessoreihin kattavasti yli kahdeltakymmeneltä eri tieteenalalta.

Kysely paljasti valtaosan vastaajista (92 %) tarvinneen erilaisia mittareita (kuva 2, numerointi kyselystä) vaihteleviin tarpeisiin (kuva 3).

Valtaosa vastaajista on tarvinnut erilaisia mittareita.
Mittareita on tarvittu monenlaisiin tarpeisiin.

Vastaajat ovat tyypillisesti hakeneet tarvitsemansa tiedot itse (90 %), mutta jatkossa näyttäisi olevan halukkuutta (46 %) käyttää myös kirjaston tarjoamia metriikkapalveluita, varsinkin kun tarvetta mittareille oli valtaosalla vastaajista (94 % melko todennälköisesti tai varmasti) myös tulevaisuudessa.

Halukkuutta saada koulutusta tutkimus- ja julkaisutoimintaa kuvaavista mittareista löytyi selvästi yli puolelta vastaajista (62 %). Täsmennettyjä toiveita koulutusmuodoista esitti noin puolet vastaajista (51 %). Näihin toiveisiin sisältyi seuraavaa:

  • Skype-koulutusta (48 % vastaajista)
  • Pienryhmäkoulutusta (22 %)
  • Kirjalliset ohjeet netissä (11 %)
  • Videotallenne (ml. lyhyet videoklipit) (11 %)
  • Henkilökohtaista opastusta (8 %)
  • Verkkokoulutusta/-kurssina (esim. Moodle) (6 %)

Sen lisäksi, että kaivattiin koulutusta siitä, mistä ja miten mittarit löytyvät, toivottiin apua myös niiden tulkinnalle, käyttökelpoisuudelle eri tilanteissa, vastuullisuudelle ja kriittisyydelle. Vastauksista nousi mm. seuraavanlaisia kysymyksiä:

  • mikä on mittareiden merkitys ja millainen on eri tieteenalojen välinen vaihtelu
  • voiko mittareita vääristellä
  • mihin mittariin omaa tutkimusta kannattaa peilata ja miksi
  • missä tilanteessa mikäkin mittari on käyttökelpoinen
  • mitä ovat mittareiden vahvuudet ja heikkoudet
  • millainen on mittareiden luotettavuus, paremmuus…
  • miten tulkitsen niitä
  • mikä on nykyään ‘luotettavin’ kanava [metriikka]tiedon hankkimiseen
  • miten ko. mittarilukemat muodostuvat käytännössä
  • mitä hyötyä mittareista on erityisesti tutkijan näkökulmasta
  • mitä mittarit todella kuvaavat ja mitä ne henkilöstä kertovat

Esitettyihin koulutustoiveisiin löytyy kirjaston tutkimuksen tuen sivuilta jo nyt apua ja ohjeita, Tutkimuksen arviointi julkaisujen avulla -sivuilta  mm. tietoa bibliometrisistä analyysityökaluista ja tietokannoista, kuvaukset useista bibliometrisistä indikaattoreista.

Lisäksi kirjasto tulee jatkossa järjestämään koulutusta, jossa huomioidaan edellä esitettyjä toiveita. Kannattaa siis seurata koulutustarjontaamme!

 

Results of the survey in English

Thanks to all those who participated in the Research and Publishing Activity Indicators questionnaire in October 2018. Sixteen people including postgraduate students, research personnel, educational personnel and other personnel from over ten different disciplines answered the English version of the survey.

The survey revealed that all of the respondents have needed different indicators (Figure 2, numbering from the questionnaire) for different purposes (Figure 3).

All respondents needed indicators.
Indicators were needed for many purposes.

Respondents have typically applied for the information they need, but in the future there seems to be willingness (44%) also to use metric services provided by the library, especially as the majority of respondents (94% quite certainly or certainly) need the indicators in the future.

More than half of the respondents (56%) were interested in receiving training on indicators describing research and publishing. Half of the respondents (50%) expressed their hopes for training. These wishes included:

  • Skype training (19% of the respondents)
  • Written instructions online (13%)
  • Video recording (including short video clips) (13%)
  • Personal Guidance (13%)
  • Small Group Training (6%)

In addition to the need for training on where and how the meters are found, assistance was also sought for their interpretation, usefulness in different situations, responsibility and criticality. Among the answers, there were these wishes:

  • “It would be highly important to have a page on UEF website where different indicators can be found and searched for easily!”
  • “Some training in understanding the Jufo rating would be nice, since the ratings seem pretty random sometimes and not in line with what is considered a “prestigious” journal in the field.”
  • “Consortium or certain indicators that have been agreed throughout UEF or Finnish universities.”
  • “Training in altmetric.”

Answers to some of the training requests can already be found on the UEF Library’s Research Support page already. The Research Evaluation (Bibliometrics: evaluating research via publications) section includes: Bibliometric analysing tools and databases, descriptions of several bibliometric indicators.

In addition, the library will continue to provide training that takes into account the wishes outlined above. So you should follow our Training menu!

Marja Kuittinen, tietoasiantuntija | information specialist
Maarit Putous, tietoasiantuntija | information specialist
Opetus- ja tietopalvelut | Training and information services

 

Share